Jacksonowie vs. Estate [koment.]
Moderators: DaX, Sephiroth820, MJowitek, majkelzawszespoko, Mafia
Weszłam sobie na forum, spoko, może się oczytam przed MJowiskiem, bo potem jak ten żul będę tylko oczkami mrugać w akademiku. A zatem..czytam. W jakimś momencie zaczęłam sprawdzać w jakich godzinach wy to wszystko piszecie. W całkiem przyzwoitych, a byłam pewna, że to jakaś 2-3 w nocy będzie. Z uwagi na porę, zakładam, że wszyscy trzeźwi. W międzyczasie otworzyłam w osobnej zakładce filmik od Little Devil, dałam pauzę nie patrząc co to, po skończonej lekturze licząc na jakiś fakt odkliknęłam pauzę. Zupełnie na poważnie. Zupełnie...
Triniti jeszcze zrozumiem, raz babę na zywo widziałam, latała z czerwonym piórkiem na głowie. Ale Little? Newsteamie? Klara, czy to na pewno Ty?

Triniti jeszcze zrozumiem, raz babę na zywo widziałam, latała z czerwonym piórkiem na głowie. Ale Little? Newsteamie? Klara, czy to na pewno Ty?

- LittleDevil
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1081
- Joined: Thu, 10 Mar 2005, 23:45
- Location: mam wiedzieć, że cyklop puszcza mi oczko?
Tobie latwo krytykowac, Jowita, skoro, jak sama napisalas, weszlas tylko po to, zeby sie oczytac przed Mjowiskiem. Chyba nieporownywalne do sytuacji osoby, ktora od poczatku sledzi przebieg akcji i probuje sie dokopac do sensownych newsow wsrod sterty spamu i teorii godnych schizofrenika. Ciekawe, ile Ty bys wytrzymala w podobnej sytuacji, zanim by Cie szlag trafil. Wtedy pewnie tez odkrylabys, ze ironia jest calkiem niezla bronia, aby utrzymac pewna rownowage psychiczna :)

- editt
- Posts: 646
- Joined: Tue, 26 Dec 2006, 16:19
- Location: Starachowice, http://twitter.com/editt86
Michael Jackson's Estate: Jury To Decide Value Of Jackson Copyrights
Michael Jackson's estate and a businessman working with the singer's mother settled a copyright infringement lawsuit for $2.5 million on Tuesday, shortly before a trial in the case was scheduled to begin.
The settlement also restricts Howard Mann and his companies from using Jackson's likeness without permission in the future. It ends a year and a half of legal fighting over Mann's use of Jackson's name and likeness on a website used to promote unreleased songs, photographs and a book written by Katherine Jackson filled with recollections of her superstar son.
Mann is the CEO of Vintage Pop Media, which operated the website until it was ordered shut down last month by a federal judge who ruled the site violated copyrights controlled by the singer's estate. http://www.michaeljacksonsecretvault.com
Under the terms of the settlement, announced in court by estate attorney Zia Modabber, Vintage Pop Media Group is responsible for $2 million of the judgment, while the entity Vintage Associates LLC is responsible for the remainder. Vintage Associates is the custodian of the items that were at issue in the case.
Mann's attorney, Lee Durst, declined comment after the hearing. "The estate is delighted this matter is behind us," estate attorney Howard Weitzman said.
Among the items that had been improperly used were images from Jackson's posthumous film "This Is It" and a silhouette of the singer dancing in "Smooth Criminal." The settlement also blocks the usage of materials from "Thriller" that had appeared on Mann's website.
A jury trial on how much Mann owes the estate had been scheduled to begin Tuesday, with an expert estimating a license for the works is worth between $5 million and $12 million.
Mann's attorneys rejected a settlement offer last week of $2 million. They sought to introduce evidence that they were given bad legal advice about having to license the works and have considered calling Katherine Jackson as a witness. The Jackson family matriarch is one of the beneficiaries of the singer's estate, along with his three children.
U.S. District Judge Dean D. Pregerson has noted that Mann doesn't appear to have the resources to pay a large judgment. The defendants' ability to pay was not discussed in court on Tuesday.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/0 ... _hp_ref=tw
Michael Jackson's estate and a businessman working with the singer's mother settled a copyright infringement lawsuit for $2.5 million on Tuesday, shortly before a trial in the case was scheduled to begin.
The settlement also restricts Howard Mann and his companies from using Jackson's likeness without permission in the future. It ends a year and a half of legal fighting over Mann's use of Jackson's name and likeness on a website used to promote unreleased songs, photographs and a book written by Katherine Jackson filled with recollections of her superstar son.
Mann is the CEO of Vintage Pop Media, which operated the website until it was ordered shut down last month by a federal judge who ruled the site violated copyrights controlled by the singer's estate. http://www.michaeljacksonsecretvault.com
Under the terms of the settlement, announced in court by estate attorney Zia Modabber, Vintage Pop Media Group is responsible for $2 million of the judgment, while the entity Vintage Associates LLC is responsible for the remainder. Vintage Associates is the custodian of the items that were at issue in the case.
Mann's attorney, Lee Durst, declined comment after the hearing. "The estate is delighted this matter is behind us," estate attorney Howard Weitzman said.
Among the items that had been improperly used were images from Jackson's posthumous film "This Is It" and a silhouette of the singer dancing in "Smooth Criminal." The settlement also blocks the usage of materials from "Thriller" that had appeared on Mann's website.
A jury trial on how much Mann owes the estate had been scheduled to begin Tuesday, with an expert estimating a license for the works is worth between $5 million and $12 million.
Mann's attorneys rejected a settlement offer last week of $2 million. They sought to introduce evidence that they were given bad legal advice about having to license the works and have considered calling Katherine Jackson as a witness. The Jackson family matriarch is one of the beneficiaries of the singer's estate, along with his three children.
U.S. District Judge Dean D. Pregerson has noted that Mann doesn't appear to have the resources to pay a large judgment. The defendants' ability to pay was not discussed in court on Tuesday.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/0 ... _hp_ref=tw


