Page 1 of 1

Michael znowu pozwany

Posted: Wed, 13 Jul 2005, 13:14
by Yana
Co się dzieje. Michael znowu pozwany.

http://today.reuters.com/news/NewsArtic ... SON-DC.XML

Posted: Wed, 13 Jul 2005, 13:22
by MJowitek
Dzięki. Ale o tym już chyba tu było...

http://www.forum.mjpolishteam.pl/viewtopic.php?t=635

Powoli zaczynam się przyzwyzcajać do tych pozwów, wyzwów i innych nadziei na kasę...

Posted: Wed, 13 Jul 2005, 13:24
by Yana
W takim razie przepraszam, za powtórkę. Mnie to zaczyna trochę denerwować.

Posted: Wed, 13 Jul 2005, 13:25
by Luis_Makrela
Eeee...coś mi się wydaje,ze mój angielski aż tak zaawansowany nie jest...ale....czy tu chodzi to,że jakaś firma pomogła MJ'owi wykupić część praw do piosenek Beatles'ów,której jeszcze nie miał jak również pomogła w spłacie długu,tak? I nie dostała za to wynagrodzenia? :-/ Ale aż 48 mln????To chyba z karnymi odsetkami za zwłokę....

Posted: Wed, 13 Jul 2005, 15:15
by LittleDevil
Dokladnie o to chodzi. Ale na razie jeszcze nic nie jest potwierdzone - czekamy na dalszy rozwoj sprawy

Posted: Wed, 13 Jul 2005, 16:00
by Luis_Makrela
LittleDevil wrote:Dokladnie o to chodzi. Ale na razie jeszcze nic nie jest potwierdzone - czekamy na dalszy rozwoj sprawy


O!No to w takim razie skromnie stwierdzę,że mój angielski nie jest aż tak niezaawansowany :happy:

Posted: Wed, 13 Jul 2005, 18:11
by GOSIENKA
ILEŻ MOŻNA??? :surrender: dali by Michaelowi wkońcu spokój, to sie robi juz nudne!!! :smutek:

Posted: Thu, 14 Jul 2005, 21:05
by Luis_Makrela
Jackson Not Very 'Prescient' About Money
Thursday, July 14, 2005
By Roger Friedman


If Michael Jackson or one of his representatives agreed to pay a huge finder's fee to a financial consultancy, he wasn't very prescient. But of course, Jackson has had a lot of trouble planning for the future.

I told you yesterday that a company called Prescient Acquisitions of New York is suing Jackson for $48 million. The firm claim that's what it's owed for introducing the singer to the investment firm that bought out his Bank of America loans.

I also saw quotes in the press from Prescient's attorney, Steven Altman, to the effect that Fortress had given Jackson all the money he needed now, and that Prescient wanted to be paid.

But who or what is Prescient Acquisitions? There are no phone numbers listed for it in New York or New Jersey.

Furthermore, records from the New York State Division of Corporations show that the company was only formed on March 11 of this year — some five months after its lawsuit claims it went to work for Jackson. There is no other information about the firm available
.

Altman, to make matters more confusing, refuses to say who the principals in the company are.

But I am told that Prescient is in fact the holding company of one person, Darien Dash, first cousin of hip-hop entrepreneur Damon Dash and sister to actress Stacey Dash.

Five years ago, when he was 29, Darien was something of a PR monster. His company, Digital Mafia Entertainment, was one of those cutting-edge dot-coms. He claimed to have had deals with AOL and others. He made speeches and got awards.

But then the bottom dropped out. Piecing together news clips, it seems that DME — for which the phone numbers in New York and New Jersey no longer work — vanished no later than 2001.

According to public records, Dash was engaged in a number of lawsuits after that, including one brought by his former director of client affairs, Nicole Savitt.

He settled at least one case for $225,000 in 2003. Last year, the New Jersey Department of Motor Vehicles went after him, too. Two months ago, a state tax lien was levied against him for $7,843.00.

According to a Web site called Urban Expose, Dash had to downsize quickly in 2000 after making a big, short splash.

Even as his staff was being cut to shreds, Fortune magazine cited him as owning a Mercedes CL500 coupe and a Yamaha YZ125 off-road motorcycle.

His publicity tag line was that he'd hired his mother to "cut my paychecks and keep me in line."

What remains to be explained by anyone is how Randy Jackson, Michael's brother, hooked up with Darien Dash and how Dash, who came from the record business and preached about the "digital divide" to herds of unsuspecting conference attendees, convinced Jackson that he could rectify Michael's enormous financial problems.

Dash could not be reached for comment yesterday. Altman declined to comment or name his client. He did say he knew Darien, and knew of Damon Dash, during a short interview.

In fact, Prescient, though it claims to have done so in its lawsuit, and Altman is quoted as saying so, did not save Michael Jackson by getting Fortress Investments to buy his $270 million loan from Bank of America.

All that's happened is that Fortress owns the loans. Fortress's only largesse was in doing a little refinancing so that Jackson got a $3.3 million loan from them in May.

Come December, the "Beatles catalog," as part of the mandatory Sony/ATV Music Publishing divorce, will have to be dealt with.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,162495,00.html

This post has been edited by Wildcats: Today, 07:10 AM


Nie no...to już jest mocne...To znaczy,ze Michael został pozwany przez firmę,która w czasie rzekomej "pomocy" mu udzielonej jeszcze nie istniała :wariat: Ciekawe :surrender:

Posted: Thu, 14 Jul 2005, 21:24
by LittleDevil
hehe, Roger Friedman znow w swym zywiole - jego ulubiony temat! ale trzeba przyznac, ze ostatnio dobrze sie sprawia w wyszukiwaniu faktow! wreszcie sie nauczyl, na czym polega dziennikarstwo!

Posted: Thu, 14 Jul 2005, 21:33
by Mike
ile razy słysze, czytam michael pozwany tyle razy ciarki mi przechodzą. :nerwy: